<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Nick Baynham - Software testing for the agentic era.</title>
    <link>https://testingwithagents.com/blog</link>
    <atom:link href="https://testingwithagents.com/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <description>Notes on AI-augmented software testing and agentic workflows.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 18:05:12 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <item><title>Software testing for the agentic era</title><link>https://testingwithagents.com/blog/software-testing-for-the-agentic-era/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://testingwithagents.com/blog/software-testing-for-the-agentic-era/</guid><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>What stays the same, what changes, and what to build first when AI agents start participating in the testing loop.</description><category>Agentic Testing</category><category>agents</category><category>strategy</category><category>ai-in-qa</category></item><item><title>Why AI agents still need human testers</title><link>https://testingwithagents.com/blog/why-ai-agents-still-need-human-testers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://testingwithagents.com/blog/why-ai-agents-still-need-human-testers/</guid><pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>The cases where current agents miss, why they miss, and the kind of judgment that does not transfer.</description><category>Agentic Testing</category><category>AI Risk</category><category>agents</category><category>ai-in-qa</category><category>judgment</category></item><item><title>Agentic engineering antipatterns</title><link>https://testingwithagents.com/blog/agentic-engineering-antipatterns/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://testingwithagents.com/blog/agentic-engineering-antipatterns/</guid><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>Five failure shapes I keep seeing when teams adopt AI agents in testing and tooling work.</description><category>Agentic Testing</category><category>AI Risk</category><category>agents</category><category>antipatterns</category><category>ai-in-qa</category></item><item><title>What QA should provide as evidence of readiness</title><link>https://testingwithagents.com/blog/what-qa-should-provide-as-evidence-of-readiness/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://testingwithagents.com/blog/what-qa-should-provide-as-evidence-of-readiness/</guid><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>A short list of things a quality engineer should be able to point at on a story before saying &quot;this is ready to ship.&quot;</description><category>Quality Strategy</category><category>qa</category><category>process</category><category>release-readiness</category></item>
  </channel>
</rss>